Part 3 of the Block/Lass PRC forum
Folks, this might be it for today. I’ll continue with the next three questions tomorrow.
Folks, this might be it for today. I’ll continue with the next three questions tomorrow.
OK, sorry, I accidentally tagged on part of Jerome Block Junior’s answer to the third question at the end of his answer to the second question, but you’ll get the full responses to Question #3 in the next video…assuming I don’t collapse and/or have a nervous breakdown.
So be patient, folks. Dave Maass videotaped the forum today, sponsored by The Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce and ACI, and I’m attempting to edit it. But it’s long, we’re on deadline etc. etc. So it’s coming at you in pieces, starting with Part 1: bios and the first question.
Mark my words: this will be remembered in history as the “Joe the Plumber” debate. I’ll also predict that Joe the Plumber is the central theme of SNL’s forthcoming spoof. Man, McCain addressed this Joe the Plumber way too often during the debate. I’m not Joe the Plumber, Joe Six-pack, Joe Biden or Joe Dimaggio. I’m not a joe, I’m a Dave and your plan won’t cut my taxes a penny.
So, it’s probably no shock that I’m calling the final debate for Obama. Here’s why:
Let’s see what the instant poll says. At some point, I’m sure a network will interview Joe the Plumber himself for his decision.
UPDATED: Joe the Plumber still kinda agrees with McCain, but mostly the Plumber was in favor of going to bed. Which he has with no further comment.
CNN Dial Testers: Three things to know: No. 1 Dial Testers, both men and women, love Obama, No. 2 They do not like CEOs, foreign cars or lying liars, No. 3 Ohio women love everything more than Ohio men do or anyone at all, for that matter.Sorry…the embed links aren’t working for me.
SNL’s take on the Veep debate.
SNL’s skit on the bailout.
In case you were wondering what was going on on the TV last night during that merciless morass of a drinking game, here is Palin’s rationale, courtesy of Adennak.
Biden’s thought process went a little more like this:
OMG, did she really say that? >Oh yes she did> Smile> Oops, no smiling> School her!
I’ve made Gov. Sarah Palin’s claims about Sudan divestment the subject of my small contribution to the mass fact-checking effort. Here’s her statement from the debate:
“What I’ve done in my position to help, as the governor of a state that’s pretty rich in natural resources, we have a $40 billion investment fund, a savings fund called the Alaska Permanent Fund. When I and others in the legislature found out we had some millions of dollars in Sudan, we called for divestment through legislation of those dollars to make sure we weren’t doing anything that would be seen as condoning the activities there in Darfur. That legislation hasn’t passed yet but it needs to because all of us, as individuals, and as humanitarians and as elected officials should do all we can to end those atrocities in that region of the world.”
Alaska has $22 million invested in companies tied to Sudan. Governor-Elect Palin was sent a letter by Congress (including Sens. Dick Durbin and Sam Brownback) urging her to support divestment on Nov. 15, 2006–only a few days after her victory in the general election.
Palin did not publicly support divestment until April 3, 2008. It took her more than 16 months. When the Santa Fe Reporter alerted Gov. Bill Richardson’s office of New Mexico’s money tied to Sudan, it took him less than two weeks to order the divestment of a total of $45 million. A few weeks later the job was done and the money moved.
Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano signed a divestment bill for Sen. John McCain’s home state of Arizona on March 10, 2008. Sen. Barack Obama’s state, Illinois divested in June 2005 - more than a year before Alaska “found out” about it’s investments.
UPDATED: Own the sidewalk has even more details (including links to committee testimony) on why it died in the Alaska legislature. Quick answer, Palin’s folk argued against it in the House.
UPDATED: ABC News, the Washington Post and Newsday have also debunked Palin’s claims.